Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable British peer who inherited his title in 2017, and therefore never sat in the House of Lords (due to the House of Lords Act 1999). Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO (no entries in biographical dictionaries, distinctions, contributions to a specific field). Previous discussion closed as no consensus two years ago. British peers are not inherently notable.

Source assessment follows:

Pilaz (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:NPOL. VocalIndia (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass politician notability. Holders of noble titles are not default notable, and we lack enough sourcing to show that he is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article is mostly about who he is descended from. Notability is not inherited so this is not the basis for an article. If he were a member of the House of Lords, or had achieved notability in another field, then he probably would merit an article, but as things stand I think this is a pretty clear cut case. Dunarc (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability is not inherited.  The sourcing is not great (the Express is an unreliable source and the Telegraph is less reliable than usual when indulging an interest in aristocracy and wealth for their own sake) and the fact that only sources like that can be found is in itself a sign that this is an unimportant figure of no relevance to most people's lives in Britain, let alone everywhere else.  RobinCarmody (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.