Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Noble (activist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Richard Noble (activist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Basically a vanity autobiography. To give you some idea of the vanity, the subject also created Richard Noble Day, about a non-notable holiday about himself. His own article admits that no LGBT organization has given him an award. Calton | Talk 13:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Jamez42 (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jamez42 (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: More information on the NPOV noticeboard. --Jamez42 (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't made up my mind about voting. While there may be notability if it is demonstrated that the subject was involved in the approval of laws, I think that WP:TNT may apply. --Jamez42 (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete So far the majority of sources seem to have COI themselves. There are a lot (overciting?), but the fact that everything I have checked does not pass muster makes be vote delete.Slatersteven (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete A quick look over the sources and most do not even mention Richard Noble. Instead talking about various events independent of the subject. PackMecEng (talk) 15:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Article is much too long, violates WP:PEACOCK, and is full of irrelevant references and non-independent sources. (I'll see if I can lop it back.) Nonetheless, articles by independent journalists published in the Florida Times-Union, Mountain Democrat, Washington Blade, and maybe the Windy City Times squeak past GNG's requirement for significant coverage in independent reliable sources. FourViolas (talk) 23:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The sources collected here make it pretty clear that at least the cross-country "Walk for Equality" is notable. It may be that the article should be recast as about the event per WP:BLP1E, as Noble's other activism doesn't seem to have attracted as much RS attention. FourViolas (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Generally people are not notable for one event.Slatersteven (talk) 10:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - It seems to have been impossible to keep the wording neutral and it would be better if the whole thing were re-started from scratch by an uninvolved contributor if there is evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:TNT. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.