Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard O'Shaughnessy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Galatz Talk  22:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Richard O'Shaughnessy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person holding non-notable job  Galatz Talk  14:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Galatz  Talk  14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  Galatz  Talk  14:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 14:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 14:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

*Delete Fails GNG, NATHLETE, etc. South Nashua (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * In view of the rescue efforts and the nominator's WP:HEY comments below, would you consider withdrawing your "Delete" vote? Cbl62 (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, big improvement there. Yeah, My bad on this one. Happy to change to a Keep. Unsure why the article creator just didn't add all of that in the first place. South Nashua (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Served as captain of an elite, ranked American football team, won All-Big Ten and Catholic All-America honors, won back-to-back Big Ten heavyweight wrestling championships, and received coverage both as a football player and as a champion wrestler and coach. Cbl62 (talk) 15:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Here is the version I nominated vs the version  has fixed it to here . WP:HEY may now apply. -  Galatz  Talk  16:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed. The article was a real mess at the time of the nomination.  I have undertaken some rescue efforts this morning. Cbl62 (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I see a good amount of independent third party coverage, more than enough to pass WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the brilliant expansion work.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.