Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Oppenheim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. This isn't the strongest consensus (due to lack of participation) but a delete consensus does narrowly exist for me. Daniel (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Richard Oppenheim

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Yemen,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Saudi Arabia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, i went searching around and found a few more sources to add to this article. one of which was The Guardian, the others might be questionable in their reliability. Overall, i think with the new sources that i found in just a few minutes, this is now a weak keep that meets the GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - Apparently, Richard Oppenheim was replaced as ambassador July 2023. (https://www.gov.uk/government/people/richard-oppenheim). — Maile  (talk) 02:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Routine coverage like talking on behalf of the government. Nothing indepth to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG due to very little coverage available and, per above, what is available appears routine. The Guardian source mentioned above is a trivial mention. Uhai (talk) 05:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.