Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard P. Nielsen (academic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 14:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Richard P. Nielsen (academic)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:NAUTHOR. Collaboratio (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Collaboratio (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Collaboratio (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I think he has a good case for WP:PROF (searching Google Scholar for author:richard-p-nielsen finds five publications with over 100 citations each, all of which look likely to be the subject's) and #C6 (president of the Society for Business Ethics). The single book and it's published reviews aren't enough for another pass of WP:AUTHOR but they don't hurt either. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the h-index and as president of a scholarly society. Bearian (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:PROF (president of the Society for Business Ethics) Lightburst (talk) 23:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.