Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard P Hastings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 02:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Richard P Hastings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

At first glance it looked like there was enough in the publications to be meet the inclusion requirements, but on digging the books turned out to be self published or vanity press. All coverage appears to be from primary sources - I couldn't find anything significant in secondary sources. Bilby (talk) 06:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, reads like an advertisement; agree with Bilby regarding validity of sources. Personman (talk) 08:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, initially looks good but the sources are either poor or inappropriately cited, and the books are clearly non-notable; fails WP:N ✤ Fosse   8 ✤  14:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.