Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Padovan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Richard Padovan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not satisfy the notability criteria of WP:BIO. Weakly sourced. D.Lazard (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete or redirect: the page asserts that the Padovan sequence is named after him, although that page doesn't verify this. Maybe some of the details from his biog page could be added to that page ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found three books with a total of six published reviews. I think that's enough for WP:AUTHOR. Having a sequence named after him should be an additional reason to keep, not an excuse to redirect. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:AUTHOR. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- meets WP:AUTHOR and likely WP:PROF for the Padovan sequence. The article is sufficiently sourced to establish notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.