Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard R. Halverson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Richard R. Halverson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Assistant Professor at University of Wisconsin. No third party sources or claims of notability. Fails WP:PROF. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 19:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 19:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Assistant professor, around 10 papers in peer-reviewed journals & a couple of book chapters according to his CV -- not yet evidence that he passes WP:PROF. The only possibility is the CAREER award, but it looks like that's basically just a fellowship for promising beginning researchers. Willing to change my mind if anyone can show exceptional significance for the award. Espresso Addict 03:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. He has a few papers with high cite counts already, but he's middle author on them, so it's unclear to me how much credit to give to him for them. —David Eppstein 04:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep due to his NSF grant, but it needs a rewrite. Bearian 23:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NSF grant winners are not automatically notable - no assertion of activity that satisfies the criteria at WP:PROF. Eusebeus 11:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per Eusebeus. --Aarktica 20:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.