Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Salsman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Richard Salsman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability criteria. Entry is basically a resume; no independent sources. Subject had a non-notable business career, and is a non-notable (untenured PhD) academic. Rap7910 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. BLP from early WP days, no refs, basically CV of a 2012-PhD-minted person who has not yet satisfied any notability criteria. Agricola44 (talk) 15:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. Doesn't appear to meet any notability standard. Found a smattering of mentions and quotations in independent sources, but nothing that I could call significant coverage, either in terms of biographical material or review/engagement of his works. Perhaps he will be notable one day, but he doesn't seem to be there yet. --RL0919 (talk) 17:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't appear to meet any notability standard. ALongSleep (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.