Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Schefren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 22:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Richard Schefren

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

SPA article on a 'business therapist' and hypnotist. Can't verify any of the sources cited exist or if they do exist, that they support claims. The USA Today article (which appears to be a mirror site) only mentions him as someone who applied, but was not accepted, the the reality show 'The Apprentice'. EBY (talk) 02:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Edited to add that this article was speedily deleted by NawlinWiki on 3 July 2014.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  02:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  02:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Only two of the references have links and one of them is his own website. I added links to refs 2-5 from a ProQuest database search — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horndog96 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 19 November 2014‎ (UTC)
 * Comment - My problem with those is that the subscription is needed. I know that use of ProQuest subscription-only links is a debate going on elsewhere, so I will just say that without seeing these articles, my opinion is still that this article doesn't meet guidelines. EBY (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with using paywalled sources. Temporarily uploaded the four srcs here for you to review czar ♔   22:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete subject does not meet notability criteria--Mevagiss (talk) 13:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.