Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Smiedt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Richard Smiedt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Neither he nor his product is notable. This is essentially advertising. Both Crains and Inc. are  publicity, not actual reporting.  DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete just holding a patent is nowhere near making someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- all PR and nothing of substance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.