Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard St.Ofle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Richard St.Ofle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No demonstration of notability. Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NARTIST. Run-of-the-mill artist. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  18:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  18:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  18:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  18:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the fact it was created by an SPA is irrelevant for deletion discussions. The valid question is whether or not there are good sources in the article and in general. the answer to that is no.104.163.148.25 (talk) 02:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.