Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Teo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Richard Teo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:ACADEMIC, and the subject requests deletion via OTRS (email 2010060910037031 for those interested) Ironholds (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete based on weak notability and personal request for deletion. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 15:23, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This doesn't look like one of those cases where the encyclopedia will be harmed by honoring the subject's deletion request. The article is oddly vague at some points (He went to "various universities"? He invented "various medical devices"? He is commercializing "some instruments"?) and lacking in reliable sources, so if it were kept it would require major cleanup, and it doesn't present strong evidence that the subject passes WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.