Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Vobes (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Richard Vobes
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Four news hits (two of which don't mention him), barely any Google hits, and an article (even pre-stubification) that has been pretty much unsourced since its creation. I am more than happy to be wrong but I think the '07 AFD came to the incorrect conclusion. Fails just about every inclusion metric we have that I could test. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Literature, Entertainment,  and Biology. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. I could not find any significant third-party coverage. Which is probably why the WP:BLP is completely unsourced.   Mike   Allen   20:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.