Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Waites (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Richard Waites (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject has had a long career, but that doesn't necessarily make it a notable one. His only role of any note was in a 1990s daytime children's TV series. Absolutely no coverage from any reliable sources, thus failing WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Karyn Devlin (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to one of the shows, Zzzap! or No. 73 but to prevent BLP issues, this can simply be deleted for now I suppose. My searches found nothing good so there's no possibility of improvement from my POV. SwisterTwister   talk  21:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   13:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and SwisterTwister. Searches unfortunately showed nothing to meet notability requirements.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.