Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Wildash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Richard Wildash

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Notability (politics) proposes that diplomatic notability should be a person who has "received significant coverage in crafting an international agreement or related to a notable diplomatic event. That doesn't appear to be the case here. Uhooep (talk) 12:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Angola, Cameroon,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. some routine coverage but nothing indepth. LibStar (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - on one hand he fails the diplomatic standard as related above; on the other hand, he's listed in the British Who's Who, but that is not significant coverage in multiple sources. So I'm of two minds on this one. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.