Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard the Lionheart: Rebellion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "It exists" is not a valid reason to keep an article. ✗ plicit  11:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Richard the Lionheart: Rebellion

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES; found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 07:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience is improved by following the destructive Afd and notability guidelines which indicate this and many other informative and factually accurate articles about topics with verifiable existence (you can Google watch it for yourself—as verifiable as it gets) need to be deleted. The guidelines need to be revamped per CREEP to remove their destructive effects, but in the meantime we must simply ignore them per IAR, a pillar policy. —В²C ☎ 16:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Arguing that the notability guidelines are destructive is at this point an ice cold take - if we didn't have some kind of guideline about what content to keep or retain, we would have zero quality control or ability to remove spam and cruft. A garden must be pruned lest it be overrun with weeds. Under the current guidelines, an absence of sources means we cannot retain this or any other article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.