Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richardson Recreation and Wellness Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Richardson Recreation and Wellness Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

If you check the history of this article, it previously went through XFD under a different name, with the decision being deletion. That was several years ago and the article still exists today. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swan River Kinsmen Pool. Am I missing something here? Rogermx (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The original nominator has failed to give a valid rationale (this having been deleted previously would not be an actual argument for deletion; you can try WP:G4, but what appears to have been deleted is Swan River Kinsmen Pool, something entirely different). So instead, I'll give a proper rationale, and relist (to allow for actual discussion):
 * Fails WP:GNG, current article does not cite a single independent reliable source; and searches do not yield anything of further interest beyond directories, social media pages, and the like. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your analysis and the new rationale. My assumption is that if this were indeed a brand new article under the name Richardson Centre, it would not appear in the article history for Swan River. Rogermx (talk) 19:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable town facility, with little/no coverage in reliable sources. Oaktree b (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacking independent coverage. Sam Mehrab (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.