Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richest Arab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 10:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Richest Arab

 * — (View AfD)

Unsourced, incomplete and unverifiable list Static Universe 04:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's also worth mentioning that all but one of the people on the list has "unknown net wealth". MER-C 04:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Unknown net wealth" for everything, and it doesn't even restrict itself to single people. Even if it did, why is a list of the richest Arabs important? -Amarkov blahedits 04:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete There aren't even figures for the net worth of all but one of those on the list. It is complete nonsense. --Sable232 04:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - WJBscribe (WJB talk) 06:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this article is pointless OR - and bad OR. KazakhPol 06:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or add relevant sourced information Alf photoman 12:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete OR. TSO1D 15:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as original research. This is a list with an arbitrary scope and no added value.  I would be amendable to a snowy close or other expedient close.-- danntm T C 18:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but move and improve. I think that it should be moved to List of richest Arabs, and then all the net worths need to be researched and added. Also, there should be a list of individuals and/or a list of families rather than merging them into one list. 0L1   Talk   Contribs  23:32 16/12/2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if not sourced until AfD closure and rigourously improved. gidonb 01:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.