Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond Practice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Bishonen as G11, spam. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Richmond Practice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This looks like self-promo. Additionally a family-owned private medical clinic is probably not notable enough to get an article. Yann (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Clearly not yet notable for a solid even generally notable article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  22:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:43, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Self promotional and notability not demonstrated. The current references do not manage to demonstrate notability according to WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. In addition the sources are not sufficiently independent. I tried reducing some of the inappropriately promotional content at the start of this year towards a more WP:NPOV but it appears since then the promotional content has been reintroduced and even more added. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedied. This is 100% an advertisement. PS, the creator was indeffed as a sock in 2013. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.