Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Crouch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Rick Crouch

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Here is a weird one. When I found the article it was in this state:. Looked to be a notable bounty hunter/PI who later became a politician. The problem is not one of the references actually mentioned the subjected with the exception of a very dubious "LA times article" in the form of a PDF for download off of the subject's website which appears to actually be a press release. When I stripped away everything that wasn't verifiable, all that was left was a City Council men of very dubious notability. This article was created and maintained by two single purpose accounts. Leivick (talk) 16:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The office he holds is a metropolitan district with 3 million people and includes the city of Durban. Almost all articles on politicians and politics are edited by people with agendas, so nothing special about that. We just have to keep an eye on them so they don't become too one-sided. Jaque Hammer (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep Well spotted and nicely cleaned up. But I agree with Jaque, the subject is notable, due to his present occupation. Anthony (talk) 03:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.