Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick D'Amico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Jake   Wartenberg  01:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Rick D'Amico
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. 0 refs and full of fact templates. Most hits at Google from social networking sites. Pmlineditor Talk 17:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. B.Rossow talk contr 17:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep He does exist and he is a Phoenix-area anchor, according to []. Now whether this is notable enough is beyond my paygrade, but I do know this, that if the article is kept, it's going to need a considerable overhaul, first for grammar (the thing is shoddily written) and for factual accuracy (according to his official bio, he has won one Emmy, not "several", for instance). Pat Payne (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - notability not established by sources. HOWEVER if someone is able to introduce sources that back up the article's claims (particularly the Emmy nominations), I'd happily change my vote to Keep. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. 3 years without sources is enough to prove to me that he is not notable. Kevin (talk) 00:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.