Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick DeBruhl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Rick DeBruhl

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Deletion nomination Was proded for lack of notability. Prod was removed after a few references were added. I still don't think there's much here. This is a non-notable local consumer affairs reporter. He's won a smattering of local awards, but not much. Having a job and doing it well does not make one notable. Even a really cool job like TV reporter. I don't see anything here that passes the relevent guidelines, such as WP:N and WP:BIO. Jayron32| talk | contribs 04:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable. As above, just being on TV isn't enough to warrant a full entry. Snowfire51 (talk) 04:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletions.   —Littleteddy (talk) 12:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 15:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Didn't find any of the 'awarding' agencies as notable enough for an article here. Probably a nice guy, but seems to fail notability.  Pharmboy (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.