Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Eyre (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 11:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Rick Eyre
This page was originally deleted by me (see previous nomination). I'm relisting this page on the basis of meatpuppery  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 11:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - figure it's notable Hoopydink 11:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NN. I don't get how this is notable. Danny Lilithborne 11:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I am copying my comments from the original AfD. IMO, it is a borderline case, so when you vote, my request is to please take a close look at the mentions about him online before deciding one way or other : Borderline case, but on the right side IMO. Is reasonably known in the internet because he was an editor in Cricinfo for six years and ran the daily Cricinfo 365 which was popular in the late 1990s and early 2000s (discontinued when the internet boom got over and cricinfo cut costs). Currently, among other things, runs the site Cricketwoman.net which is probably the most informational site solely dedicated to women's cricket. The site seems to be down at the moment, this is the from the google cache from the last week '' Tintin (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn and violates WP:V with no sources to mark notability.--Jersey Devil 12:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not particularly notable IrishGuy 13:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't meet WP:BIO in my opinion; and on a side note, article is not WP:V sourced.--Isotope23 16:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough. J I P  | Talk 18:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * And I'll repeat my Delete from the first time around as a NN blogger. RGTraynor 20:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete Derex 22:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article declares that he is notable, that's about it. Aplomado - UTC 22:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely, totally nn. Bed-Senior 8:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: User's first and only edit  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 17:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: So what? I guess when someone lodges their first vote in an election, that vote doesn't count eh? There are some politics being played out here I think. Bed-Senior 11:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yes, their "vote" doesn't count. AfD is based on a consensus of Wikipedia editors.  The opinion on non-Wikipedia editors is irrelevant.
 * Comment: Sure, and how do these 'Wikipedia editors' who apparently possess so much wisdom make their first edit - if you can't first edit without being a 'Wikipedia editor'? Get a grip, this guy is majorly nn and one guy here seems to be playing games to keep him listed. Bed-Senior 13:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly nn. NTK 17:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.