Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Isaacson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Rick Isaacson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any reliable sources about this person. Sam Walton (talk) 21:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails wp:academics with few publications and citations in the low double/high single digits. WorldCat holdings in the double digits. No awards. Fails wp:author - one non-academic book, very small press, zero library holdings in WorldCat. Fails due to promotional language. Fails due to lack of third-party neutral references. LaMona (talk) 22:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I hate AFDs like this, that is, AFDs about a person, probably a very fine person, written by an SPA who probably loves that person and wishes to honor him, but where, as in this case, it is clear that the book was published by a "press" created only to publish that book, the article creator appears not to understand that regular newspapers have to write about you before Wikipedia can, and searching produces nothing resembling a RS. E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.