Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Leong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Big Dom  15:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Rick Leong

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Sp33dyphil © • © 06:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, not notable, nor particularly encyclopedic...Modernist (talk) 23:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep given coverage here and here for example. Pburka (talk) 04:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * What makes "Torontolife.com" a reliable source? Sp33dyphil © • ©
 * I'm kind of stunned by that question. Toronto Life is a monthly magazine published by a well known publisher (St. Joseph Media). It's been published for 45 years. What makes you question its reliability? Pburka (talk) 13:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep many third-party sources easily accessed by even a superficial online searchGrandPhilliesFan (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:CREATIVE number 4 is met. Plenty of exhibits have his stuff.   D r e a m Focus  02:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- not wikipedia notable artist, minimal independent coverage, resulting in promotion using En Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 01:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per reasons mentioned above by Pburka and Dream Focus, this artist has signifigant notability. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable, per reasons mentioned above by Pburka and Dream Focus above. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.