Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Neigher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Rick Neigher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

self referenced. promotional Rathfelder (talk) 16:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete In spite of a huge list of works on the page (all copied from allMusic.com, AFAIK), I can't find any substantial 3rd-party sources about him. Everything here that is not from allMusic is from his own social media sites. I'll check back to see if anyone had better luck than I did. LaMona (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment (Thanks Rathfelder for the "heads up".)
 * I created this article 6 years ago, I haven't looked at it in the last 5 years, and am now semi-retired and, being Australian, am very busy preparing my income tax return due next Monday. Given that the article has been there for 6 years, I don't see any need for a speedy deletion.  If you hang on for a couple of weeks, I'll address the problems when I've finished with income tax.  Cheers, 49.183.202.31 (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * No urgency.Rathfelder (talk) 08:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To allow the ip editor an opportunity to improve the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now I suppose as News, Books and Highbeam actually found quite a few links but I'm not sure if any of is useful as they're simply credits and such. Pinging past users and.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - was waiting to see if there would be any improvement, but there isn't, and the searches don't turn up much (a single brief mention on News, 3 brief ones on Newspapers, there are quite a few on Books, but again most are just listings or mentions, nothing on Scholar, and only a couple of mentions on Highbeam). Might be more offline, so would not be against resubmitting if more can be found.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.