Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Prosser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Rick Prosser

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable distiller. Article is poorly sourced, the only real contender for a decent source is this local news piece that doesn't even refer to him by name. Can't find any other sources online that even give him a passing mention. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   15:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as re-created WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT. I'm sure he's a good bloke, and good at his job, but notable he ain't. Fiddle   Faddle  20:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable local grogmaker. When an article describes in detail trivia such as schooling, family and recreation it is clearly struggling for credibility. No reliable, independent sources of significance. WWGB (talk) 00:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:25, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.