Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Gill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:10, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Ricky Gill

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet notability criteria per WP:POLITICAN or WP:NOTNEWS Arbor8 (talk) 20:28, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete He has gotten a little more widespread coverage than most first-time congressional candidates, but still, not notable. All the coverage is about his candidacy, not about HIM. And no wonder: he is just 24 and still in law school, so he hasn't had much time to develop notability. --MelanieN (talk) 01:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to United States House of Representatives elections, 2012. Subject is not notable on his own, but he is related to a notable topic. Perhaps this is a case of WP:TOOSOON? --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unelected politician, clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. Seems like article is used as political promotion, WP is not a soapbox. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.