Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Otto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Punkmorten 17:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Ricky Otto

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

A valuable resource. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarfo (talk • contribs) 2007/03/26 00:52:30
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Ricky Otto genuinely is a former professional footballer, that much is true (see this link), however everything else in the article is clearly total bollocks, so I !vote to delete without prejudice to recreate if someone ever fancies writing a legitimate article on him..... keep now that someone has written a legitimate article about him ChrisTheDude 12:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 12:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A1 In light of the rewrite, I change my vote to Keep Kntrabssi 13:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Stongest of keeps possible now that I've rewritten it to be about the actual person. Played professional football in England so definitely meets criteria for notability. Possibly semi-protect to stop morons messing it up. Keresaspa 14:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, former professional footballer, good enough to get a mention on Football Heroes. Qwghlm 14:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Definite keep - on reviewing the edit history, it looks like there was a prize for whoever could add the most outrageous statement to the article. Prior to the rewrite, the article was, as ChrisTheDude says total bollocks. Daemonic Kangaroo 16:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep following rewrite. Oldelpaso 17:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.