Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rico Beats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Due to the low participation, this is a soft delete. Undeletion may be requested at WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 06:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Rico Beats

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Little is known about this producer. Most of the information (all 3 sentences) come from one reference which I'm not convinced sources all of the information given. Per WP:BLP, I'd classify this as a violation of notability. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  16:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is currently one source in the article which confirms his work with the three artists mentioned. There are other sources out there, e.g. MTV, The Source, Billboard. He's at least borderline notable. What exactly is a 'violation of notability' anyway? --Michig (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry I mean that he hasn't really received coverage as a primary topic. There's information about him working with notable artists, and there's coverage about those artists/songs but as a person he hasn't received extensive coverage. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  16:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found the original Billboard link here and found other results here and here (all recent and the second one mentions a different artist, Dominic Lord). Additional searches at both Google News and Books provided nothing useful. He has certainly associated himself with well-known artists but I think it's probably too soon for now. I have no prejudice towards a future article when there is more in-depth coverage about him. SwisterTwister   talk  23:02, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 17:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.