Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RideOn (technology company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

RideOn (technology company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A typical promotional article. covered by Wired merely a part of any new startup with product coverage. Just the press for startup but not for its significance. other references are merely mentioned nothing notable. need to much more than that to become an encyclopedia notable. This is not a directory for startups happens everyday and even get funded and even get few coverage by popular media. Light2021 (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * leaning Delete tone is breathlessly anticipatory that they may have a product some time. There's RS coverage, but it's all aspirational and clearly originating in a PR outreach. They may be notable if they get this thing out, but in the meantime I think this is a WP:TOOSOON - David Gerard (talk) 11:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely unbelievable this was actually accepted from not only having been started for not even a full day after, but the fact it was clear advertising from the get-go, notice the advertising PR information and links and also the fact it was one PR-motivated account, all of that combined damns it as advertising and it's something we know quite clear about, therefore we make no compromises about such blatant adverts and we sure as hell attempt our best to not even accept them lest we send the "advertising is accepted" signals. SwisterTwister   talk  02:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Wikipedia is not a collection of product brochures on unremarkable subjects. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly Too soon. If the company survives long enough to be independently notable then at that time, if not too promotional. Amused that RideOn has been around four decades. W Nowicki (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.