Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ride & Swerve (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blak Jak. Consensus is song is not notable on its own (non-admin closure) MarginalCost (talk) 09:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Ride & Swerve (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NALBUM. Info on page is already covered on the artists BLP. Insignificant 3rd party coverage for it's own wp page. Comatmebro (talk) 04:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. This fails WP:GNG entirely. Germcrow (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Blak Jak - Unsourced. Vague stub. Not notable. Foxnpichu (talk) 13:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Originally voted delete, but changed vote after looking at other opinions. Foxnpichu (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Blak Jak as R from song but keep the categories. Hopeless WP:NSONG fail, but categories are useful search tools. Narky Blert (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Blak Jak. Was considering doing that earlier when I tagged it, but was letting someone else be the judge. Wgolf (talk) 20:09, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.