Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rideau Students' Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Rideau Students' Union

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There were two sources provided of secondary coverage. New organization, no real secondary coverage of it. Fails WP:NORG.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 17:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 17:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 17:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * There were two sources provided of secondary coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deputy8787 (talk • contribs)
 * Referring to this version:
 * Listing at unacdashboard.unac.org, updated by the organization itself. Not secondary, not independent.
 * Homepage. Not secondary, not independent.
 * Brief quote of president of Union in Ottowa Citizen. Not significant coverage, not independent.
 * Morning show segment on local radio. It is unclear which segment is referred to from the link, but this is probably an interview so not independent. Not significant either.
 * -- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 17:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

What exactly constitutes independent? User: Deputy8787 — Preceding undated comment added 21:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I didn't find anything other than what found. Doesn't appear notable., independent means that a source not connected to the subject of the article is discussing it.  This goes into significant detail. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Organizations are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and just having a couple of hits of coverage in its own local media market is not enough to get it over the "notable because media coverage exists" bar. An organization has to pass WP:ORGDEPTH, which means it has to have coverage expanding well beyond just a handful of mentions of its name in the local media — for instance, the organization is not the subject of either of the two media hits provided here, but just gets briefly namechecked in coverage whose core subject is something else. That's not what it takes, and the other two footnotes are primary sources that aren't support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Expertwikiguy (talk) 03:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.