Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridgeford Properties


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Ridgeford Properties

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable company. Google and GNews hits are all directory listings and press releases, nothing amounting to extensive coverage in independent sources as would be required by WP:NOTE. It's also worth noting that the creator of the article was indefinitely blocked for having a spam/advertising-only account. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because their only claim to notability is that they are associated with Ridgeford Properties, so if that entry is deleted, these should be too:


 * Delete all. Utterly unremarkable real estate agents advertising on Wikipedia.  No claim to encyclopedic significance is made in the articles.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all per Smerdis. No more to add. Bearian (talk) 17:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.