Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridhwan School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep and merge to A._H._Almaas. Ruslik (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Ridhwan School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable school, possible original research, no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. Ray Yang (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Diamond Approach or A.H. Almaas, and redirected. (or Keep) This was the only high-quality RS I could find specifically about it; of course it is mentioned in some of the many good sources for the other two articles. Should easily be treated in the above articles, or kept according to people's preference.John Z (talk) 03:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment/Reply I question how a local paper's report on a local religious group counts, as you say, as a "high-quailty RS." This is a local news organization reporting on a local event. This is far from a "high quality RS." Claims as to why this school is notable, and third party reliable sources to back up these claims, are still absent. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Couldn't think of the right word at that moment. Perhaps "indisputable" RS?  There's no doubt about its independence (third party) and reliability, so "absent" is not correct, just one solid RS is more precise.  No time to look at other possible sources.John Z (talk) 04:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge with Almaas or Diamond approach, no substantial independent notability:  -- Jayen 466 15:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Diamond Approach --Chinawhitecotton (talk) 03:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge To A. H. Almaas. Not enough reliable sources to establish notability of Diamond Approach alone. Redirect and merge with A. H. Almaas. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.