Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riding with Sunshine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Let me know if you'd like the page moved to a personal page for further editing but note that the article shouldn't be restored to mainspace based on the available sourcing. czar 23:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Riding with Sunshine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this has enough citations to reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.

My Evaluation of the sources:


 * 1) Neighborhood journalism that reads like an ad.
 * 2) A real review in a possibly reliable but not well-known source
 * 3) Not coverage of the subject
 * 4) An announcement of a screening
 * 5) A review in a source that advertises itself saying [We] will rate and promote your Indies film. Official Selections of Film Festivals and Award winners will have priority on being reviewed, the trailers shown and their film introduced to a worldwide public.
 * 6) Brief coverage in a film shorts roundup on a blog
 * 7) A seemingly non-notable award from a pay-to-play review website

All told, we have one example of decent coverage in a reliable source, but an obscure one that doesn't leave me hopeful that other sources will have picked up on this subject, and no claim to meeting WP:NFILM. signed,Rosguill talk 07:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 07:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 07:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - has won some minor awards, but nothing close to passing WP:NFILM, and has Rosguill's in-depth analysis of the existing sources, in addition to my own search, doesn't have enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 17:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – does not pass WP:NF, and article is very poorly written. – DarkGlow (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * ""Keep"" - It has an reliable source. Maybe the writer of the article was new or didn't know how to source properly. I worked on a couple of links and will look up more sources to add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icethistle00 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Feel free to continue working on the article, but the sources added as of this comment don't comprise significant coverage and the festival awards don't seem notable enough to push it over the edge. signed,Rosguill talk 04:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I will. I noticed she won an award from the Irish Echo. I thought that was pretty notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icethistle00 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not seeing sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:NFILM. Not opposed to Userfying (moving it into a user's sandbox) if the author requests it, to continue development in case there are more we're not seeing. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 21:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.