Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riecoin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 17:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Riecoin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no indication of significance. I'm not sure if this fulfills Notability criteria. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Electronic currency article of unclear notability, lacking independent refs. Links provided are developers' pages and forums and do not establish notability. A search did not reveal any significant RS coverage. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - The coin is brand new, and proves to be a great tool for scientific research:
 * See Phys.org:
 * http://phys.org/news/2014-02-virtual-currency-riecoin-math-problem.html
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.69.75.196 (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - this coin falls flat on it's ass faster than Bitcoin's own market value in terms of WP:GNG. Prime example of WP:PROMO. Citation Needed  &#x007C;  Talk  03:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails to meet GNG at this time due to insufficient reliable sources. Currently two sources found:
 * Agyle (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Agyle (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Agyle (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.