Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riedelia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator has withdrawn request to delete after articles listed in the disambiguation page were created, rendering the dab page useful. (non-admin closure)  Goodvac   ( talk ) 09:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Riedelia

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

dab page with only redlinks Morgankevinj(talk) 23:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: I resurrected the alga article and blued the plant redlink with a cheap stub. No need to delete the dab page now. Rkitko (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: should exist, as should the one article which hasn't been created. &mdash;innotata 23:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The two redlinks have articles in Wikispecies, so potentially valid and the link with article is also in Wikispecies. Combined they have many 100's of Google Books hits. So I guess it just needs to the editor who created the last article to create the first two. scope_creep (talk) 23:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Close per unanimous keep Morgankevinj(talk) 23:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.