Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigantona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Ian Manka Talk to me! 23:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Rigantona
Appears to be vanity. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 16:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I wish we had more sources, but I don't think this group is going to be showing up on Google or the Billboard Hot 100 even if they are notable in their field, as the article implies. NawlinWiki 16:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - No real press coverage or any claims to meet WP:BAND that I see. Even if their genre isn't the most popular, some sort of music journal would have an article on them if they were indeed notable.  No objection to having this if there are some reliable sources presented claiming this.  Wickethewok 19:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable vanity. --Coredesat talk 22:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.