Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right on Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to the album. This is what we do with most album track articles, and that people here want to delete suggests there's not consensus for keeping them separate articles. W.marsh 13:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Right on Time

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Whilst updating the Californication (album) article, I turned a lot of the articles for the individual tracks in it into redirects as they weren't independtly important articles, there were no sources to back up the claims, and there wasn't anything that could be said that wasn't original research. Most of these redirects stuck, but two of them, Right on Time and Savior (song) have been reverted twice. I spoke with User:MiTfan3 about it and he seems to have ignored my comments about policy, etc, and so I believe it would be better if the articles could be decided about by outside parties and just deleted. There is (in my opinion) no reason for them to exist.  Kamryn Matika  16:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating: Savior (song).  Kamryn Matika  16:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete both. There's nothing in those articles that couldn't be said on the album page. BTLizard 17:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

First off, it wasn't me who reverted the Savior page, but it was who reverted the Right on Time page because there is sufficient enough information mentioned on that page, not mention on the Californication (album) page, to leave it alone. And don't say I've ignored your comments about policy, I left all of the other pages redirected except for Right on Time, like I said, I didn't revert Savior. - MiTfan3


 * I meant that in your reply you didn't respond to my comments about policy. Nevertheless, as you didn't reinstate the articles, I'll strike my comments. :)  Kamryn Matika  02:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Weak Keep The song is released by Red Hot Chilli Peppers, a long running and famous band. According to the proposed guidelines at WP:MUSIC, it should at least give it a pinche of notability. However, more sources still are needed regarding the band's comments on the song.--Kylohk 10:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * According to WP:MUSIC the songs need to be a released single by a notable band. These are not singles.  Kamryn Matika  03:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * delete - the proposed guidelines at WP:MUSIC shouldn't supersede WP:N, there's a discussion about that right now. If there are no external sources who have written about these two songs, then delete them both. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.