Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right to Succeed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Right to Succeed

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Organisation that does not appear to meet WP:ORG. Apparently created in response to this advert. That doesn't necessarily mean that the organisation isn't notable, and the fact that the article currently contains promotional language is fixable, but I fail to find significant coverage of the organisation in reliable independent sources. bonadea contributions talk 12:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

it is a notable organisation, and it shown in Vegas Morning Blend Show --Mohamed Ouda (talk) 11:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, that link is in the article as well, but my opinion is that this doesn't constitute significant coverage. --bonadea contributions talk 13:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Note The AfD template was removed by an IP editor and was absent from the article for a day and a half; I just restored it. --bonadea contributions talk 13:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)



here is also another populat site that mention to the foundation reformeducation.net --Mohamed Ouda (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 13:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep, this artical looks as though it could still be expanded, give it a chance. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.