Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RightsLogic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

RightsLogic
I added a prod and a template. the prod was per WP:CORP both were removed without explanation and at the time of AFDing, the NPOV issues from advertisement had not been dealt with i kan reed 13:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with fire, WP:SPAM. Add some Ketchup and you've got a sandwich. WilyD 14:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Nuke/Delete it. Throw that sandwich in this microwave with some cheese and you have a better sandwich ;). Seriously, I thought this article was better suited for an advertisement in a magazine -- Brian  ( How am I doing? ) 14:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, spamvertising. NawlinWiki 14:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Spam is icky, but I think this company is notable in the context of digital rights management, which can also be icky. Sometimes articles that arrive as spam turn out to be dealing with something notable, and I think that's what happened here. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 16:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "I think this company is notable" is a subjective judgement, not an application of a notability criterion. Notability is not subjective. Uncle G 01:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  per nom M  a  rtinp23  18:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have tried to add more informative content to make it less spam like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erikwe (talk • contribs) 2006-08-15 18:25:08
 * What you should be adding are sources. Please cite sources to show that this company has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works from sources that are independent of the company.  See WP:CORP and User:Uncle G/On notability. Uncle G 00:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.