Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rihanna: The Last Girl on Earth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Rihanna. No prejudice against recreation when more reliable sources become available. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 19:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Rihanna: The Last Girl on Earth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Announced biography that, at this point, is failing the notability guideline, is based entirely on unreliable sourcing, and from a check there are still not reliable sources available that have picked this up or can even confirm it. Lots of blogs, amateur news at examiner.com, celebrity "news" at celebuzz.com or radaronline.com.

This may be real. If it is, it will in all likelihood become notable. At this point, it very much fails WP:V. Unless that changes, it has to be deleted. Amalthea 01:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete until someone other than blogs and gossip rags confirm it. - eo (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:CRYSTAL based on blogs and fan-fluff. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 05:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The article in question is based on speculation from unreliable sources ~ DC (Talk&#124;Edits) 05:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Confirmed by the book's publisher, Rizzoli, and Amazon.com - see references. XL XR2 (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work on it, I'm of course much happier with the current state of the article. However, we really only know that the existance of the book has been confirmed by the publisher, but nothing more. The history section doesn't cover the book, and even the fact that it's a photo book covering Henwood's work with Rihanna is only from an unreliable source. I tried searching for anything new on it, but had no luck. I have added the sourced parts back to Rihanna, but still believe that this topic should only be a redirect to Rihanna for now since it lacks verifiable content and fails community consensus on notability of books, at this point. Amalthea  12:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.