Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rijad Smajić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Unanimous submissions for keep on GNG grounds (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Rijad Smajić

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - I found, , , , , , , , and , among many many more German and Bosnian sources. Young clear topic of interest with ongoing career regarded in German and Bosnia and Herzegovina football. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of knowledge, and this article is a "yes" to The one question.  Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 20:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources User:Das osmnezz brings forward, which are not surprising seeing he is on the squad of a Bundesliga team. -- Mvqr (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep There are numerous reliable German sources to conclude WP:GNG is there. The only future for this article that I see is extending, not deletion. Rodgers V (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly passes GNG. BEFORE not met.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources User:Das osmnezz. Shows enough notability. Equine-man (talk) 14:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep notable Lightburst (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.