Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rikochet (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No argument was made for keeping the article, the only suggestion that even a redirect was appropriate was withdrawn. j⚛e deckertalk 19:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Rikochet (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The name of the game was changed to Rekoil and we have an article there for it. The name is not a useful redirect. Odie5533 (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rekoil, as Rikochet was the working title for more than two years, and it would be reasonable to expect it to be used as a search term. —Torchiest talkedits 13:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I thought about that, but no one is currently linking to Rikochet (video game) and having a hat note or disambiguation page for Rikochet seems more useful. I don't think many people will be entering in Rikochet (video game) into the search bar or into articles any more. --Odie5533 (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I forgot to reply to this earlier. That's good reasoning, and I agree.  Changing to delete. —Torchiest talkedits 14:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. As Odie says, "Rikochet" is a plausible search term, but "Rikochet (video game)" isn't. DoctorKubla (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.