Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rilly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Rilly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - hasn't played international football per NFT or any other source I am aware of; fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 23:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league or for his national team, meaning the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT which excludes players who have been called but not played for a national team. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I am going to hold my vote till after the African cup of nations has finished. Govvy (talk) 15:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Its likely he wont play because he is a GK.Simione001 (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - hasn't played football at senior level, hasn't earned coverage from multiple non-trivial independent sources, so fails guidelines as nom. C 679 21:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.