Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RingPlus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Our policies and guidelines don't look for potential for notability. They look for whether there is notability now. Kurykh (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

RingPlus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of this is reliably sourced with third party sources--neither the positive information nor the negative--see the page history, because at the moment I'm writing this the positive material has been removed, apparently on the basis of being both unsourced and contaminated by COI.  DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Not seeing notability. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 06:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep There is some potential for notability. Fortune and Tech Times ran articles on the shutdown for example. If we were able to establish notability for Ting it seems likely it can be established for RingPlus as well. EyeTripleE (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply a business software listing with nothing actually significant to establish the needed notability, as usual, there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone. SwisterTwister   talk  22:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean by 'simply a business software listing' . RingPlus is/was an MVNO, not primarily a software company. Also, I'm not saying that RingPlus inherits notability but that a priori Bayesian reasoning suggests notability is possible. EyeTripleE (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - While I guess this might have potential for notability, current searches do not show the type of in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to establish such.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.