Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring of Fire (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 11:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Ring of Fire (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Kadı   Message   14:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Literature,  and Italy.  Kadı    Message   14:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It looks like it got reviews by both Kirkus Reviews that you can find here, and Publishers Weekly that you can find here, as well as a short review in The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books, which is here. None of the reviews are particularly long, but I believe they would fulfil point one of WP:NBOOK. I took a look at the Italian Wikipedia, but it does not look like this book has its own article there to draw any additional sources from. At the very least, if other editors do not agree on these reviews being sufficient for Keeping, this article should at least be used as a Redirect to Pierdomenico Baccalario rather than being deleted. Rorshacma (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the reviews above, I found this in Italian, which gives us the two reviews for WP:BOOKCRIT even if we discount Kirkus/PW. (A surprising number of books don’t even make it to Kirkus/PW/Booklist so I don’t think they’re unacceptable for BOOKCRIT but it’s nice to see other sources too.) ~ L 🌸  (talk) 19:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The proffered sources are sufficient to support an article.  Eluchil404 (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.