Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ringo (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 17:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Ringo (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

there seem to be a number of games called Ringo but I can't find any significant sources discussing this version. Article is overdetailed, and effectively unsourced. Gugrak (talk) 06:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Gugrak (talk) 06:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Have added a second source and commensurate text. As far as "overdetailed", I quite agree; however, trimming down substantially is an editing matter, not a cause for article deletion. (It's common for original article creators to over-detail, simplification isn't easy it's a skill, I've acquired some of said skill but haven't edited this article before today.) p.s. Perhaps the article title s/b more specifically Ringo (board game) rather than Ringo (game). --IHTS (talk) 07:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Have also added a second R.C. Bell source. --IHTS (talk) 08:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Barely.  // Timothy :: talk  03:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.